229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.93%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 3.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.08%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 6.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-12.26%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.94%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.04%
R&D change of 7.04% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.52%
Other expenses change of 51.52% while SONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-2.37%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.12%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 4.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.35%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 143.72%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-19.36%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.31%
EBITDA margin decline while SONY shows 44.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.52%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONY's 12.68%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-15.32%
Pre-tax income decline while SONY shows 48.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONY shows 50.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.80%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 86.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.00%
Net income decline while SONY shows 26.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONY's 28.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.69%
EPS decline while SONY shows 26.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.69%
Diluted EPS decline while SONY shows 26.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Share count increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.34%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
