229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONY's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
21.46%
Cost growth 50-75% of SONY's 33.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.08%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONY's 38.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.21%
Margin decline while SONY shows 2.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.92%
R&D change of 8.92% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.00%
Other expenses change of 16.00% while SONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
15.55%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SONY's 8.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.44%
Similar total costs growth to SONY's 27.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.39%
D&A growth while SONY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.27%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.41%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SONY's 2.53%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONY's 86.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
6.53%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONY's 827.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONY shows 640.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.80%
Tax expense growth less than half of SONY's 2056.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.82%
Net income growth below 50% of SONY's 616.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.01%
Net margin decline while SONY shows 483.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.33%
EPS growth below 50% of SONY's 616.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONY's 615.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.51%
Share count increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONY's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
