229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.57%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
34.16%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
22.43%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.47%
R&D change of 6.47% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-612.07%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.57%
Operating expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.51%
D&A growth while SONY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.16%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.65%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 19.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.71%
Operating margin decline while SONY shows 56.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
23817.24%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.24%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.97%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.43%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.21%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.77%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.77%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Share count change of 0.26% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
