229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.05%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.45%
Cost growth less than half of SONY's 19.13%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-4.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.71%
R&D change of 2.71% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-354.65%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.99%
Operating expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.92%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.89%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 1380.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-6.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.91%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 187.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.34%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 558.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.23%
Share count change of 0.23% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.18%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
