229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.43%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 5.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.54%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 23.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.02%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.95%
R&D change of 10.95% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.48%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.44%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 7.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.90%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 19.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.64%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 6.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-14.82%
EBITDA decline while SONY shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.28%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.90%
Operating margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.03%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONY's 81.69%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.08%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.19%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.35%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
