229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.62%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 15.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.88%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 5.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-19.23%
Gross profit decline while SONY shows 49.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.63%
Margin decline while SONY shows 29.26% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.16%
R&D change of 4.16% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.23%
Other expenses change of 96.23% while SONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.58%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.98%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.48%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 4.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
D&A growth while SONY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.90%
EBITDA margin decline while SONY shows 34.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.77%
Operating income decline while SONY shows 201.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.83%
Operating margin decline while SONY shows 160.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
94.59%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.33%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 57.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.73%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.32%
Share count increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
