229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.69%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.67%
Cost growth less than half of SONY's 46.08%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-3.95%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.42%
R&D change of 3.42% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9225.00%
Other expenses change of 9225.00% while SONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
11.72%
Operating expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.34%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 35.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.49%
D&A growth while SONY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.07%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.71%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 100.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.16%
Pre-tax income decline while SONY shows 99.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONY shows 99.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.08%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 731.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.82%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.06%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Diluted share change of 0.12% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
