229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
53.70%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
51.47%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
57.49%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SONY's 27.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.47%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONY's 29.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.87%
R&D growth while SONY reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.00%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 220.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.03%
Operating expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.56%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.20%
Interest expense growth less than half of SONY's 19.40%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
20.25%
D&A growth while SONY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
65.98%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONY's 161.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.99%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONY's 164.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
74.11%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SONY's 146.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.28%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONY's 146.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
117.70%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
74.59%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.24%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
74.01%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.22%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.33%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.33%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.89%
Share count reduction while SONY shows 0.73% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while SONY shows 16.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.