229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.24%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 5.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.42%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 2.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.46%
Gross profit decline while SONY shows 11.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.29%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONY's 6.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.21%
R&D change of 1.21% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.98%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.17%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 2.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.20%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 2.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.43%
Interest expense growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.61%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
68.24%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.86%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 15.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.68%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while SONY shows 4.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
