229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-33.37%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 4.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-32.59%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 2.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-34.52%
Gross profit decline while SONY shows 12.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.73%
Margin decline while SONY shows 7.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.45%
R&D change of 4.45% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.92%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.09%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 10.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.64%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.30%
Interest expense growth less than half of SONY's 49.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-16.15%
D&A reduction while SONY shows 2.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-39.30%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.44%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-42.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.63%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-42.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.17%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.68%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.80%
Share count reduction while SONY shows 7.75% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.95%
Diluted share reduction while SONY shows 9.71% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
