229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.01%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.30%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
20.20%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.00%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.45%
R&D reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-379.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.83%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.18%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.47%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.39%
D&A growth above 1.5x SONY's 3.49%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
29.89%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.14%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.66%
Operating income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.62%
Operating margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONY's 182.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.40%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.74%
Tax expense growth less than half of SONY's 111.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
36.26%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.49%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
