229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.37%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.35%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.23%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.96%
R&D change of 0.96% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
377.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONY's 5490.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.89%
Similar operating expenses growth to SONY's 8.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
5.22%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.05%
Interest expense growth less than half of SONY's 78.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.54%
D&A growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.27%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-321.40%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.74%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.58%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.86%
Share count reduction while SONY shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.87%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
