229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.52%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 4.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.50%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.54%
Gross profit decline while SONY shows 9.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.03%
Margin decline while SONY shows 4.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.28%
R&D growth less than half of SONY's 2.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.38%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 210.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.08%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 7.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.77%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 3.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.43%
Interest expense reduction while SONY shows 370.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.48%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 16.71%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-25.96%
EBITDA decline while SONY shows 13.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.66%
EBITDA margin decline while SONY shows 7.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.74%
Operating income decline while SONY shows 13.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.93%
Operating margin decline while SONY shows 8.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
164.78%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.78%
Net income decline while SONY shows 0.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.01%
EPS decline while SONY shows 0.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.62%
Diluted EPS decline while SONY shows 0.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.69%
Share count reduction while SONY shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
