229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.47%
Positive growth while VUZI shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.44%
Similar cost growth to VUZI's 11.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-14.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.12%
R&D growth while VUZI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Other expenses reduction while VUZI shows 2.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.13%
Operating expenses growth while VUZI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
Total costs growth while VUZI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.00%
Interest expense change of 20.00% while VUZI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-28.00%
D&A reduction while VUZI shows 22.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
76.92%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x VUZI's 13.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.56%
EBITDA margin growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.03%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x VUZI's 10.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.10%
Operating margin growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.16%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x VUZI's 38.20%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-15.19%
Pre-tax income decline while VUZI shows 11.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.71%
Tax expense reduction while VUZI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.00%
Net income decline while VUZI shows 11.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.45%
EPS decline while VUZI shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.15%
Diluted EPS decline while VUZI shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while VUZI shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
