229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.53%
Revenue growth below 50% of VUZI's 27.27%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
15.05%
Cost growth less than half of VUZI's 58.44%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.65%
Positive growth while VUZI shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.18%
R&D growth less than half of VUZI's 18.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
7.65%
Operating expenses growth less than half of VUZI's 27.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.81%
Total costs growth less than half of VUZI's 34.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.00%
Interest expense growth while VUZI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.18%
D&A growth less than half of VUZI's 50.98%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
7.41%
EBITDA growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.59%
Operating income growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.98%
Other expenses growth while VUZI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.42%
Pre-tax income growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.83%
Tax expense growth less than half of VUZI's 125.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.28%
Net income growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.50%
EPS growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.37%
Diluted EPS growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.31%
Share count reduction while VUZI shows 28.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.32%
Diluted share reduction while VUZI shows 28.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
