229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-31.19%
Revenue decline while VUZI shows 59.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-30.77%
Cost reduction while VUZI shows 52.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-31.88%
Gross profit decline while VUZI shows 281.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.00%
Margin decline while VUZI shows 139.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
R&D growth while VUZI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.02%
Other expenses growth less than half of VUZI's 6225.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.94%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-26.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
13.48%
Interest expense change of 13.48% while VUZI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-10.46%
D&A reduction while VUZI shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-38.47%
EBITDA decline while VUZI shows 23.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
EBITDA margin decline while VUZI shows 51.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.54%
Operating income decline while VUZI shows 20.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.49%
Operating margin decline while VUZI shows 49.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.50%
Other expenses reduction while VUZI shows 233.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-42.30%
Pre-tax income decline while VUZI shows 20.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.15%
Pre-tax margin decline while VUZI shows 50.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.36%
Tax expense reduction while VUZI shows 44.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-42.09%
Net income decline while VUZI shows 20.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.85%
Net margin decline while VUZI shows 50.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.95%
EPS decline while VUZI shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.90%
Diluted EPS decline while VUZI shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.30%
Share count reduction while VUZI shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.52%
Diluted share reduction while VUZI shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
