229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.35%
Positive growth while VUZI shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.95%
Cost growth less than half of VUZI's 8.47%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.39%
Positive growth while VUZI shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.23%
Similar R&D growth to VUZI's 4.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1480.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x VUZI's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.31%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VUZI's 1.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.82%
Similar total costs growth to VUZI's 3.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-7.93%
Interest expense reduction while VUZI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.30%
EBITDA growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
Operating income growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.02%
Pre-tax income growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Tax expense reduction while VUZI shows 237.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.04%
Net income growth while VUZI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.56%
EPS change of 1.56% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1.56%
Diluted EPS change of 1.56% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1.09%
Share count reduction while VUZI shows 9.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.13%
Diluted share reduction while VUZI shows 9.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
