229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.16%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.71%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.33%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.81%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.54%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.33%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.23%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
38.92%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.98%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
61.70%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.99%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
65.21%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.11%
Tax expense change of 65.11% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
65.31%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.09%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.28%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.28%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.05%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
