229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.32%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.91%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.69%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.57%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.37%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.78%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.25%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.24%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.26%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.09%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.51%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.51%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
