229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.67%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
3.63%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-19.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.77%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.16%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-226.57%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-240.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.37%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-292.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-269.76%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-269.71%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-269.79%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-280.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-276.83%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-270.73%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.04%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.08%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
