229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.97%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
27.44%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-8.42%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.60%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.61%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.66%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.57%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
117.03%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
103.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
102.84%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-192.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
101.45%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.26%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.47%
Tax expense change of 101.47% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
101.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.25%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.38%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.43%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.80%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.94%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
