229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.23%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.33%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
10.31%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.83%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-15.96%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.62%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-87.50%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.71%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
136.17%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
212.18%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
221.21%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
223.98%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-22.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
129.19%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
129.86%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-112.07%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
121.46%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
121.95%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
121.57%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
119.61%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.30%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.59%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
