229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
75.37%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
82.35%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
58.07%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.76%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
29.02%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.03%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.26%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.67%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.76%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.16%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.54%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
128.95%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.20%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
550.00%
Tax expense change of 550.00% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
64.86%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
60.32%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.29%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.63%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.99%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
