229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.99%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-9.56%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.95%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.22%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-7.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.25%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.00%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.57%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.19%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
43.10%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.42%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
40.25%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.49%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.32%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
53.38%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.73%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.91%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.70%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.00%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
