229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.17%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-1.09%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.41%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.43%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.05%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
57.14%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
67.48%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
79.66%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-59.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.36%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.60%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.16%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.06%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.16%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.21%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.60%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
