229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.47%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.44%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-14.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.12%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.13%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.00%
Interest expense change of 20.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-28.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
76.92%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.56%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.03%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
19.10%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.16%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.19%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.71%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.00%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.45%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.15%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.59%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.08%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
