229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
42.11%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.75%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1933.33%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1390.12%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.98%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.00%
Other expenses change of 25.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-1.50%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.84%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
103.38%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.95%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.90%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
97.82%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
121.02%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
114.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
121.59%
Tax expense change of 121.59% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
120.77%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
114.62%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.64%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.64%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
