229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.07%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
12.73%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.36%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.79%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-120.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.54%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.35%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.00%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.18%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1200.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1042.64%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
715.38%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
697.03%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
40.32%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.84%
Tax expense change of 36.84% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
41.86%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
37.63%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.91%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.78%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.73%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
