229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.69%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.69%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.43%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.00%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.38%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.69%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of WLDS's 14.90%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.24%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Operating income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 14.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.90%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-26.79%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.05%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 13.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.69%
Tax expense change of 7.69% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
8.20%
Net income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 12.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
10.06%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.68%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.33%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.59%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.25%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
