229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.20%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.96%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.75%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.67%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.25%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
337.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
337.02%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
350.00%
Tax expense change of 350.00% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
333.33%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
332.86%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.40%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.89%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
