229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.75%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.68%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
2.39%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.84%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
Other expenses change of 50.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.07%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.33%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.56%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
53.33%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.39%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-26.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
36.84%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
Tax expense change of 40.00% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
35.71%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.57%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.57%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.08%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.42%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
