229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.84%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.19%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-1.12%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.90%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.36%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Other expenses change of 33.33% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.30%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.00%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.09%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.67%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.35%
Operating income growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.50%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-184.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.44%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.98%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.03%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.80%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.59%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
