229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.50%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.51%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.47%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.63%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.35%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.71%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
600.00%
Interest expense change of 600.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
13.89%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.47%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.57%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.00%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
218.18%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.81%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Tax expense change of 33.33% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
32.61%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.70%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.82%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.27%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.65%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.80%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
