229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.68%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.94%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.42%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.40%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Other expenses change of 66.67% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
4.59%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.63%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.57%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.44%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
54.55%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.72%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.78%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
52.36%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.15%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
72.94%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
48.21%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.83%
Tax expense change of 70.83% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
73.77%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
48.93%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.97%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.86%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.27%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.35%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
