229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.13%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.35%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.75%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.90%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.76%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.60%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.08%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of WLDS's 13.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.19%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.99%
Net income growth below 50% of WLDS's 12.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.66%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.26%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.28%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.68%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
