229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.39%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.73%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
19.55%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.98%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.99%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-703.33%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.18%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.18%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.93%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.94%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.74%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.16%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.79%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.21%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.15%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.92%
Tax expense change of 13.92% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
35.48%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.43%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.83%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.58%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.57%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
