229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.93%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.08%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-12.26%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.94%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.04%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.52%
Other expenses change of 51.52% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-2.37%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.12%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.35%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.36%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.79%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.52%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.32%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.80%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.00%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.72%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.69%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.69%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.34%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
