229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
21.46%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.08%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.92%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.00%
Other expenses change of 16.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
15.55%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.44%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.39%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.27%
Similar EBITDA growth to WLDS's 14.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-2.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.41%
Operating income growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.00%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.53%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 13.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-8.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.80%
Tax expense change of 8.80% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
5.82%
Net income growth below 50% of WLDS's 12.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.33%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.51%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.49%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
