229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.57%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
34.16%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
22.43%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.47%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-612.07%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.57%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.51%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.16%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.65%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23817.24%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.24%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.97%
Tax expense change of 10.97% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
32.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.21%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.77%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.77%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
