229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.43%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.54%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-10.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.02%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.95%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.48%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.90%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.64%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.82%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.28%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.03%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.13%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.08%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.40%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.04%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.19%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.27%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.35%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
