229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.62%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.88%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-19.23%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.16%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.23%
Other expenses change of 96.23% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.58%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.48%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.47%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.77%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
94.59%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.64%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.33%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.08%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.73%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.32%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
