229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.69%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.67%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-3.95%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.42%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9225.00%
Other expenses change of 9225.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
11.72%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.34%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.49%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.07%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.44%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.16%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.08%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.81%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.82%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.06%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Diluted share increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
