229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.57%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.12%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
46.24%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.48%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-111.23%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.34%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
110.00%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
61.88%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
61.51%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.00%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.75%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1005.88%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
62.23%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.06%
Tax expense change of 72.06% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
59.04%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.93%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.29%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.06%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.06%
Share count increase while WLDS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
