229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
53.70%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
51.47%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
57.49%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.47%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.87%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.03%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.56%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.20%
Interest expense change of 1.20% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
20.25%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
65.98%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.99%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.11%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.28%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.70%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
74.59%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.24%
Tax expense change of 76.24% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
74.01%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.22%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.33%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.33%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.89%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.84%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
