229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.00%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-18.06%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-17.90%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.12%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.73%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.00%
Other expenses change of 37.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.05%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.13%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
17.65%
Interest expense change of 17.65% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.13%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.01%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.36%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.13%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.89%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.21%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.81%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.71%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
