229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.53%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.05%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.65%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.18%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.20%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.65%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.81%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.00%
Interest expense change of 15.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.18%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.41%
EBITDA growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.59%
Operating income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 14.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-3.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.98%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.42%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 13.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-2.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.83%
Tax expense change of 9.83% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
9.28%
Net income growth 50-75% of WLDS's 12.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-2.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.50%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.37%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.31%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.32%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
