229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
67.92%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
66.57%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
70.15%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.32%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.68%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.00%
Other expenses change of 60.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.16%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
57.46%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.21%
Interest expense change of 10.21% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.51%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
85.97%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.75%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.26%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
94.22%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.66%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.45%
Tax expense change of 117.45% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
87.28%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.53%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.46%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.54%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.71%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.50%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
