229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.88%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-12.92%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-12.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.56%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.78%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-11.23%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.82%
Interest expense change of 6.82% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.70%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.01%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.65%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
145.26%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.84%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.77%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.66%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.49%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.84%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
