229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.09%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.18%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
17.94%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.32%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.00%
Other expenses change of 240.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.15%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.71%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Interest expense change of 2.60% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.34%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.53%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.61%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.80%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.22%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-54.91%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.61%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.08%
Tax expense change of 30.08% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
22.62%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.84%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.42%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.86%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.60%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
