229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.01%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.30%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
20.20%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.00%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-379.07%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.83%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.18%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.47%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.39%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.89%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.14%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.66%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.62%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.78%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.40%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.74%
Tax expense change of 30.74% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
36.26%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.49%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
